 |
|
About Us >
What we’ve inherited: The standard of
community forestry in NACRMP, or Phase 5
When the fifth stage of the Nepal Australia Forestry Projects (NAFP),
the Nepal-Australia Community Resource Management Project (NACRMP),
came to a close in January 2003 (after an nine-month bridging phase),
it left behind a very positive legacy. However, due to insufficient
mechanisms for institutionalisation, Project leaders felt that it
was not necessarily a model of community forestry (CF) that would
be sustainable. It is up to the final and current stage to cement
that change. At the same time, NACRMLP has also set itself the goal
of ensuring that whatever it does succeed in institutionalising is
based on certain fundamental principles, like gender and social equity
(GSE) and good governance (GG), which NACRMP was not fully successful
in establishing. Since the direction the final phase is taking is
so profoundly shaped by its successor’s achievements and shortcomings,
it is important to explore them in more depth. (For a brief history
of all five phases of the Project, see the summary table following).
|
Nepal-Australia
Forestry Projects (NAFPs) |
| Phase |
Name |
Date |
Objective |
Main
achievements |
| 1 |
NAFP/1 |
1966-1978 |
Explore
the possibilities |
Established
nurseries, improved silvicultural and nursery techniques, conducted
field trial of eucalyptus and chir pine, provided seedlings for Kathmandu Valley plantation
Employed
an action-research mode of operation
Encouraged
a high level of community participation |
| 2 |
NAFP/2 |
1978-1986 |
Implement
National Forestry Plan of 1976 in Chautara
Establish a
Tree Seed Unit in Kathmandu
for nation-wide reforestation
Provide
grants for training and education |
Established
plantations, created decentralised nurseries, constructed roads,
established methods for effective afforestation
Pioneered
community forestry (CF): transferred forests to pnachyats (local governments), demarcated
community forests,
Supported
training and education |
| 3 |
NAFP/3 |
1986-1991 |
Develop
an effective CF programme by testing practical methodologies
Improve
rural welfare through increase availability of forest products
Establish
nurseries and plantations; distribute seedlings
Transfer
knowledge to Nepalis
and internationals |
Constructed
buildings, established nurseries and plantations
Demarcated
forests, transferred ownership, made OPs
Supported
training and education, esp. of DoF
staff
Gave
high school scholarships to girls, conducted seminars for local
leaders,
Distributed
improved stoves, built erosion control structures
Adopted
user-group approach to replace panchayat |
| 4 |
NACFP/4 |
1991-
1996 |
Increase
community welfare and self-reliance through CF
Consolidate
and refine approaches to CF
Provide
greater support to CFUGs
to ensure sustainability |
Developed
OPs, established
nurseries and plantations, produced and distributed seedlings,
demarcated forest boundaries
Piloted
timber processing, investigated NTFPs
and upper slopes
Constructed
DoF facilities,
supported soil conservation activities, installed improved cooking
stoves,
Provided
scholarships, conducted trainings
Worked
to improve CFUG formation process and increase capacity
Began
to promote community-based activities: built drinking water
schemes, distributed literacy packages, implemented agro-forestry
income generation schemes |
|
5 |
NACRMP |
May
1997- Apr. 2002 |
Ensure
CF is sustainable
Build support system for CFUGs
Broaden CF to community-based resource management
and promote sustainable technologies
Develop strategies for upper slopes and sub-watersheds |
Established
nurseries and plantations
Demarcated CF boundaries and established CFUG networks
Formulated a model of CFUG formation, assessed training needs,
conducted a baseline survey, developed monitoring system
Trained GoN staff, developed ToT
curricula
Inventoried sources of support for, provided grants to CFUGs
Held workshops on forest utilisation, surveyed
and toured NTFP possibilities
Prepared report on upper slopes and established sub-watershed
criteria and made plans
Put greater emphasis on community development activities like
women’s literacy |
|
Bridging
phase |
May
2002 - Jan 2003 |
|
|
6 |
NACRMLP
Stage
One |
Feb.
2003 - Jan. 2005 |
|
|
Bridging
phase |
Feb.
2005 - May. 2005 |
|
|
NACRMLP
Final
Phase |
1
Jun. 2005-30 Jun. 2006 |
|
About Us > What
we have inherited >


On the technical level

When the Australian government
launched Phase 1 by sending a technical advisor to Nepal to
help with afforestation in the Kathmandu Valley, they weren’t
even sure what sort of trees to plant. When NACRMP began in
1997, there was no question that, given the nature of the soil
and climate, the chir pine (Pinus roxburghii) was most suitable
for Middle Hills’ plantations. Once chir pines are established
using proper silviculture, the broad-leaf species in demand
by villagers for fodder and fuel wood naturally regenerate.
At the end of the NACRMP bridging phase
in January 2003, there was still a need to change local techniques
of tree care: in particular, villagers so long inculcated with
the message to conserve, were still too reluctant to prune and
thin their forests. In fact, the need to harvest was urgent:
not only have trees matured past their economically optimum
harvesting age but not cutting them actually results in a decline
in forest quality.
Another gap was knowledge about upper-slope
cultivation, where transhumance grazing on alpine pastureland
renders the practices of lower elevations inappropriate. Work
at the technical level was still in its infancy.

|
About Us > What
we have inherited >

On the environmental level

The new plantations and the
better-cared-for natural forests established in five phases
of work had several spin-off benefits for the natural environment.
Forest degradation was arrested, as was soil erosion. In addition,
plant diversity increased and the quality of wildlife habitat
improved. For the farmers, more fuel wood and timber became
available.

The establishment of nurseries encouraged farmers
to plant a total of about 1500 ha of seedlings on their private
land. Broader results included a decline in the cultivation
of marginal land and the abandonment of the land-degrading practice
of free-range grazing.

The establishment of nurseries encouraged
farmers to plant a total of about 1500 ha of seedlings on their
private land. Broader results included a decline in the cultivation
of marginal land and the abandonment of the land-degrading practice
of free-range grazing.
One of the main problems detected with these achievements
was a lack of gender and social equity. The already advantaged
groups of society were the main recipients of seedlings and
the workload of women and girls who had to stall-feed livestock increased.
Job opportunities created for forest watchers and nursery attendants
and the like went to better educated, wealthier and more politically
aware villagers. Making sure that benefits are shared fairly
is another of the key needs of Phase 6.

|
About Us > What
we have inherited >

On the economic level

NACRMP had limited success in transforming
the community forest from the foundation of a subsistence-level
living to a source of income. Many CFUGs have neither the desire
nor the knowledge to harvest forest resources in a sustainable
manner and, even if they do, they lack the entrepreneurial skills
needed to market them. While guidelines for forest utilisation
do exist, they need to be implemented. In addition, GoN’s
policies and legislation need to be simplified if farmers are
to be able to wade through the labyrinth of requirements for
inventories, endorsement of operational plans, licenses, and
the taxes and bans on particular sales that complicate matters.
In this rather dim horizon there are bright
spots: major steps were taken during NACRMP in promoting the
commercialisation of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) through
market tours and surveys, and workshops were held to discuss
possibilities and constraints.

Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) comprise all
the other plants found in a forest except for the trees. Because
Nepal’s Middle Hills exhibit so much biodiversity, the
potential for the exploitation of at least some of these species
is high. NACRMP began with surveys and NACRMLP is extending
the work in marketing. If linkages can be established and farmers
can be trained in sustainable harvesting techniques, the farmers
of the Project area will have a long-term source of income that
can boost their standard of living considerably.
Some of the NTFPs which villagers have begun
to exploit include lokta (Daphne bholua) for paper-making, sal
leafs for plates, allo (Shorea robusta) fibers for cloth, and
lapsi (Choerospondias axillaries) for candy. The latter enterprise
already benefits 80 households in three CFUGs and generates
about 1.5 million NRs. per year. There are many more species
with potential, including nagbeli (Lycopodium clavatum), chiraito
(Swertia chirayito), sugandhwal, dhasingare (wintergreen), nargeli
(Edgeworthia garderni), allo (Girardinia diversfolia), pakhanved,
bisphej, and majhito (Rubia cordifolia). Phase 6 has made a
good start in the first eight months, as the case of Dandapakhar
demonstrates.

Already annual transactions in Dandapakhar
reach about NRs. 650,000, though collectors claim not to get
a fair price, and a network has been set up. To promote what
is still a rather haphazard business, this NTFP cooperative,
with technical assistance from the Project, prepared a two-year
strategic plan in June 2005. After participating in a cooperative
business management and NTFP marketing promotion training programme,
they prepared a mechanism for collecting six main NTFPs and
for selling them in distant markets. It is estimated sales will
generate around NRs 1.6 million in the coming year and benefit
about 500 households.

|
About Us > What
we have inherited >

On the social level

By the end of NAFP3, in 1991, a viable new
institution which could assume the control of forests turned
over by the national government, the CFUG had been
established. Phases 4 and 5 saw a refinement of its developmental
process and an increase in the numbers of CFUGs established.
By the end of NACRMP, in 2003, the CFUG had emerged as a grassroots
alternative to a hierarchical and patriarchic society of highly
differentiated caste and ethnic groups. CFUGs exhibited greater
organisational competence, more systematic administration, improved
internal communication, and better external linkages. Still,
when Phase 5 drew to a close, only one-third of the 700 CFUGs
were considered strong and mature, and the Project judged that
achieving its aim of making CFUGs self-sufficient still needed
intensive support. Specifically, progress in the last two steps
of a five-part process beginning with emergence, legal recognition,
and consolidation diversification and expansion, and service
provision to other CFUGs had scarcely begun, and SGE and
GG were principles poorly practiced.
To facilitate the CF process on the ground, the
NACRMP also worked to strengthen the Department of Forest (DoF),
particularly in its role as a facilitator of CF rather than
a protector of forests under threat from the encroachments of
villagers. Despite the numerous trainings and study-abroad opportunities,
staff commitment to this change was not universal and still
more institutional change was seen to be needed.
In addition, the DoF, due to the growing numbers
of CFUGs and its limited resources, was not up to the task of
meeting demands. Thus, the Project began to look for local non-government
service providers (NGSP) CFUG networks, (international)
non-government organisations (I/NGOs), DFOs and DSCOs, for example that
could support capacity-building. This development, particularly
the question of how the services provided would be paid for was
still in its incipient stages when NACRMLP began. Two CFUG networks
were established, one in each district, and there was some disbursement
of grants to local institutions to support CFUGs. Ultimately,
it is hoped that CFUGs will be able to fund themselves, but
commercial utilisation of community forests needs to get further
along for that to happen. This was another task for Phase 6.
Although the establishment in 2000 of a Joint
Technical Review Committee to clarify GoN’s policy objectives
and formulate a future strategy was positive, the regulatory
and fiscal environment needed to support CF was still lacking
when NACRMLP began. This, too, would have to change.

|
In sum
What NACRMLP inherited from its
predecessor was a model with much promise for rehabilitating the environment
and providing more than just a subsistence-level economy and establishing
an institutional mechanism with which to achieve these goals, but
the project was far from ready to embark upon a complete withdrawal
of services.
However, the entire series of projects has been
based on an action-research mode of operation, in which the conceptualisation
of the Project’s role has evolved in response to changing contexts
and to lesson learned, and the country’s civil conflict put
a crimp in NACRMLP’s plans. It has had to deal with the reality
of a sooner-than-anticipated end and adjust its objectives accordingly.

|
 |

|