 |
|
Publications
> Publication
Archives >
NACRMP >
Discussion Paper
A cascade training model for Nepal;
a strategy and approach.
|
| Hitchcock,
D and Singh, H.B. (2001) |
| |
This paper examines previous attempts in Nepal
to develop a cascade-training model, outlines the Nepal
Australia Community Resource Management Project (NACRMP)
model and briefly presents a summary of its strengths and
weaknesses.
The NACRMP Cascade Training Model is a multilevel process
with a primary aim of improving the quality and sustainability
of training delivered by district-based institutions (government
and non-government). The model also attempts to minimise
the effects of transfers of trained trainers, by targeting
locally based institutions and is consequently reliant on
a networking approach to training. The model has three major
activities, which are integrally linked with each other:
| |
A Trainer of Trainers (ToT)
course is based on an innovative experiential learning
approach that focuses its efforts on highly participative
classroom exercises and regular field verification activities.
The course curriculum is centred on everyday training
practice and covers analysing, designing, developing,
conducting and evaluating the components of training.
The ToT course also encourages the institutionalisation
of the training planning process by focussing its attention
on the design of new training interventions; upgrading
existing training programs; and continuous need identification,
training program planning and training curriculum development.
The ToT course is conducted over a period of eighteen
months involving eight experiential training modules
interspersed with extensive field activities lasting
10-12 months and two follow-up workshops,
conducted six to seven months later. During the modular
course each participant is required to develop a training
manual specific to their own discipline and is expected
to field test the training manual and also plan and
conduct their own ToT course. The two follow-up
workshops focus not only on the implementation of the
cascade learning model, but also on sharing experiences
with planning and conducting their own ToT courses,
other training courses and trainer and training manual
preparation. |
| |
A networking approach to
training within each district is encouraged and reinforced
throughout the ToT course. ToT participants are deliberately
selected from a wide range of local institutions. Consequently,
from the onset of the course, they are exposed to many
differing roles and diverse experiences and during the
ToT course they are encouraged to build trust, understanding
and consensus amongst themselves. These skills are complimented
with additional team building exercises during and after
the ToT course in order to encourage the establishment
of an informal and hopefully a formal networking process. |
| |
The institutionalisation
of a comprehensive training planning process within
and between the various districts-based institutions.
The preparation of comprehensive training proposals
by local institutions (detailing the curricula, lesson
plans, training materials and evaluation tools, feedback
activities, and budgets) not only encourages a quality-based
approach to training but also helps to institutionalise
training within the institutions planning process.
The establishment of District Training Review Teams
(DTRTs), composed of government and non-government institutions
involved with community resource management activities,
not only helps co-ordinate district training efforts
and maximise limited training resources, but also supports
a quality-based approach to training. |
Three ToT courses were completed during 1998,
1999 and 2000 and a total of 164 participants enrolled and
114 (57 male, 57 female) graduated. The participants, through
an intensive analysis of community problems and needs identified
32 training topics, which were used by the course organisers
to illustrate the different phases of the training cycle.
Many of these training topics were consolidated into seven
multidisciplinary training programs, which were field-tested
by the ToT graduates. The follow-up courses allowed the
graduates to discuss the lessons learnt, to analyse the
problems and issues that they encountered and to finalise
the training curricula and manuals that they had field-tested.
The last two ToT courses and follow-up workshops were planned
and conducted by a select group of ToT graduates.
There were intensive post-workshop discussions and follow-up
field visits by the organisers and modifications to the
curricula design were very much based on participants
experiences in the field and their feedback. Participant,
observer and trainer evaluations of the ToT course were
positive and modifications to the course have been cosmetic
rather than structural. The results of the ToT course impact
assessment were encouraging and show a marked improvement
in the participants attitude to experiential
and participatory learning approaches. An examination
of the graduates levels of skill/knowledge retention
and application were also extremely favorable.
The ToT course graduates established a network called the
National Training Resource Mobilisation Centre
(NTRMC) with a primary aim of co-ordinating the efforts
and maintaining the professional standards of trainers in
the two project districts. The NTRMC not only provides high
quality locally based trainers, but also establishes a permanent
and accessible training resource within the district. The
NTRMC having only been established for 10 months has been
instrumental in planning, organising and conducting many
of the training programs funded by the project, including
the ToT 2000 course.
The NTRMC provided facilitators to plan and conduct the
last two ToT courses and provided support and assistance
during the course. This institution is also in the process
of launching a nation-wide ToT course for a wide range of
institutions (Government and Donor agencies) and has been
contracted by other rural development Projects to plan and
conduct training activities.
The DTRTs have also witnessed a dramatic improvement in
the quality of training proposals that have been presented
for project funding. The role of the DTRT has also been
expanded to include the review, analysis and selection of
training proposals submitted by Government and Non-Government
Organisations within the district and to provide advice
to the various training institutions on quality training
and provide feedback during the monitoring of the training
programs.
The models achievements are impressive and appropriate,
not only to Nepal, but to any country that has limited resources
to invest in developing a sustainable training planning
process and in establishing a qualified and dedicated trainer
workforce. :
|
| |
Full
Report |
| |
 |
|
 |

|